TestEm0 - proton stopping power versus ICRU'49 evaluated data comparison
results for g4 7.1p01. The accuracy of the data above 1 MeV is about 2%.
TestEm0 - proton stopping power versus evaluated data comparison
results for g4 8.1p01:
NIST (red), g4 7.1p01 - ICRU'49 (green), SRIM'2006 (black).
The accuracy of the data above 1 MeV is about 2%.
TestEm0 - He4 ion stopping power versus evaluated data comparison
results for g4 8.1p01:
NIST (red), g4 7.1p01 - ICRU'49 (green),
SRIM'2006 (black). The accuracy of the data above 1 MeV is about 2%.
TestEm1 - proton projectile range versus NIST data comparison
results for infinite cut as a function of energy for g4 8.1p01.
Accuracy of the data above 1 MeV is about 2%.
TestEm8 - Simulation versus data (NIM 217 (1983) 277) comparison
results for energy deposition of protons in Xenon gaseous detector
for different ionisation models and g4 6.2p02.
TestEm3 - Simulation versus data (Phys. Rev. A 28 (1983) 615) comparison
results for most probable energy deposition
of protons and pions in 0.3 mm Silicon detector
for Geant4 versions 7.1p01 and 8.2p01.
TestEm5 - Simulation versus data (M.J.Berger et al. NIM 69 (1969) page 181) for 1 MeV
energy deposition in 0.54 mm Silicon detector for different Geant4 versions:
9.1 default EM physics,
9.2 default EM physics,
TestEm5 - lateral profile of 2.5 MeV proton beam after mylar foil
versus data (NIM B181 (2001) 157)) comparison results.
TestEm5 - 140 MeV proton scattering in Lead simulated by
Geant4, Geant3 and Highland formula (PDG) predictions
for thin and thick targets.
TestEm5 - 172 MeV/c muon scattering in Iron
and in liquid Hydrogen
simulated by Geant4 and results of the MuScat experiment (NIM B251 (2006) 41).
Blue points - g4 8.2 results.
TestEm5 - High energy proton scattering in Beryllium: simulation, Highland formula
predictions and data (Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 1584) here.
TestEm2 - electron 30 GeV in iron data/G4/G3 comparison
for the first G4 release (run04.mac). Data from Particle Data Group (Phys. Rev.D 54-1 July 96).
TestEm3 - Energy dependence of the energy resolution of a sampling calorimeter of the ATLAS HEC type
for different Geant4 releases:
from 5.2 to 8.2,
from 7.1p01 to 9.2.
Dashed lines show +- one RMS corridor of the test-beam data.
TestEm3 - electron energy resolution as a function of electron energy
for two structures of
sampling calorimeter:
5 mm Lead + 5 mm Scintillator and 10 mm Lead + 2.5 mm Scintillator.
Results for different Geant4 releases:
from 8.1 to 8.3,
from 8.3 to 9.2.
Hashed aria shows +- RMS of data (NIM A262 (1987) 229; NIM A274 (1989) 134), cut = 0.7 mm.
50 GeV point of simulation is obtained without analysis cut on forward leakage applied
in data analysis.
